Where’d you go?

April 16, 2011

I’ve been asked what happened with my blog- why am I not updating it anymore. Well, after getting significant positive feedback about this blog, I started putting all this into a wine book. Turns out, writing a book takes way more time than I figured it did. So while that’s in progress the blog has to take a back seat. When it’s done, I’ll post here if it’s going to be published by an actual publisher or merely on Kindle by me. Until then, cheers!

ps: I also recently discovered the wonderful world of cocktails and whiskey. If you’re already  a spirits drinker, good on ya’. If you’re not, it’s well worth your time and effort. I’ll spare you some unpleasantness and disappointment with just a couple recommendations: go buy Jameson’s 12 year, Jefferson’s Bourbon, or Aberlour Scotch. There. I just saved you six months of drinking sub-standard whiskey!


Pour it like Guiness!

January 3, 2011

The Wine Books say you should pour bubbly right down the middle of an upright glass. Some say you should pour it halfway, let the mousse subside, then top it up. Now I read in the Winter issue of QRW (Quarterly Review of Wines- it’s excellent. You should probably subscribe) that a recently released study by the University of Rheims says we can preserve up to twice the bubbles by tilting our glass vs pouring it the Old Way. I myself use another technique, a hybrid (now how hip is that?) of sorts.
I pour it like a Guinness. A good Guinness pour goes gently down the side of a tilted glass until it’s about 3/4 full. Then- and this is important- you let it rest while the beautiful little bubbles cascade down the inside. Once it’s rested you pour the rest right down the middle. This gets the glass filled to the correct level with the right amount of head: no more than a half- inch, please -everyone that’s sent a pint back for having too much head, throw up a hand!
So what I do is pour down the side of a tilted flute (I’m not a member of the coupe fan club: too much surface area) until it’s 2/3 full. Conveniently, this is usually about when the bubbles start doing their best to clamor out of the glass. Let this initial mousse dissipate, then top off until you’ve got a little more than an inch of mousse. The glasses are filled uniformly, not too many precious bubbles are wasted (anyone else out there pained by dissipating mousse from an expensive bottle?) and you end up with an appropriate mousse in the glass to boot. How about you out there in cyber-wineland? Anybody else have a great bubbly technique? Cheers!


It pays to shop around.

December 30, 2010

One common theme that keeps coming up is the importance of a good wine shop. I talk to quite a few folks that shop for wine at Central Market. And I admit that they have a reasonably good selection. Their prices are a bit high though. So shop around, and keep an eye out for better prices. For example: my favorite inexpensive sparkler is Gloria Ferrer, from California.

It is available at Central Market for around $20. The savvy shopper, however, can find it at Goody Goody for $15, and better yet at Tom Thumb for $13! So buy a few bottles- or a case- and bring in the New Year with a bargain! Cheers!
Please help keep this blog up and running. Cheers!


December 20, 2010

Please help keep this blog up and running. Cheers!


Kirkland Sonoma Brut

November 2, 2010

As regular readers of this blog know, I love sparking wine. And what’s more, I really love sparklers that are good values. That’s why I drink Gloria Ferrer, Piper Sonoma, and plenty of Cava. When I came across Kirkland Sonoma Brut yesterday at Costco, I paused a moment. And knowing how good Kirkland Champagne is (below), I decided to try it. I wasn’t disappointed.

Kirkland Champagne

Kirkland Sonoma Brut

Kirkland Sonoma Brut, $11. Produced and bottled by Cypress Ranch Cellars, Sonoma California. From their website:

“Cypress Hill Winery is a small boutique winery dedicated to making the highest quality wines in limited quantities”. This ideal seems kind of at odds with making a wine for one of America’s largest retail chains, but in this economy- like it was in prohibition- just about anything a winery needs to do to survive is understandable.  From the label:

“Kirkland Signature Brut Sparkling Wine comes from the cool-climate area of Sonoma County, California. This is an ideal growing region for the classic varietals of sparkling wine. The maritime breezes in the area lengthen the growing season to give the grapes more time to develop flavor, depth and body. The hand-picked fruit is gently pressed, the fermentation is carried out in the traditional Champagne method, with 18 months on the lees. The flavors of Asian pear, ripe apples and hints of mouth-watering citrus, along with overtones of toasted biscuit and roasted almonds make this a fresh and lively sparkler”.

If  you don’t know what they mean by traditional Champagne method, or 18 months on the lees, see our discussion of Champagne here. The classic varietals (by which they mean those varietals used by the Champenoise) are Chardonnay, Pinot Noir, and Pinot Meunier. Nothing tells us how much of which they used, or in what proportion, although Cypress Ranch Cellars makes a Chardonnay but not a Pinot Noir, so we can assume it’s mostly Chardonnay. We can also assume it’s not all Chardonnay because otherwise they would label it as -bonus points for those out there shouting the answer at their computer screens!- a blanc de blanc, or a sparkler made from all Chardonnay. But enough about the technical aspects- how’s it taste?

In the glass, it has a rich copper/ caramel hue. As you’d expect from an inexpensive sparkler, there are lots of big bubbles that produce a quickly-dissipating mousse. The nose is fruity and noticeably sweet, with an almost earthy tone. On the palate it’s simple, and pleasant. I got pear and a kind of apple skin flavor that vanished pretty quickly. It has a strong yeasty note but it’s much more bread dough than a Champagne-style brioche note. It is about on par with  Gloria Ferrar Brut, but a little less acidic and a little bit cheaper (Gloria Ferrar is usually $13-15), so that makes is a very strong value. It is also equal or superior to many Cavas at this price point, so it’s definitely worth a shot if you  like these wines.

However, this wine is just about ideal for someone who doesn’t drink a lot of sparklers, is put off by their often searing acidity, or wants to move up beyond Korbel and Ballatore. After all, this Kirkland Brut would make a great mimosa! Cheers!


I didn’t care, but now I do!

September 27, 2010

The wine books tell us that Super Tuscans started with Sassicaia, and that Sassicaia started with French vines, which legend has it came from Lafite way back when. Fine. Moving on.

But hold on a minute! Now Marchese Nicolo Incisa della Rocchetta, Big Man at Tenuta San Guido (which makes Sassicaia) tells Decanter Magazine that the first Cab Sauv and Cab Franc vines were planted in 1944, the first vintage of Sassicaia released in 1968. He says, ‘Many people speculate that the vines came from Lafite or Latour in Bordeaux, but in 1944 there was little time or opportunity to visit France. The vines were actually from the Salviati estate in Migliarino, near Pisa’. Ok. I buy that travel wasn’t easy between Italy and France in 1944. But here you have vines producing one of the best Cab Sauv’s in the world, and arguably the best in Italy, and they came from Migliarino? After decades of ‘rumors’ that they came from Bordeaux? It makes immediate sense that the best Cab Sauv vines in Italy came from the best vines in France. That connection is not quite so obvious with Migliarino. But so what?
I really didn’t care about Sassicaia’s vines until now. After reading this, though, doesn’t it sound a bit like a cover-up? A lame cover story? I had read before that the vines coming from Lafite was a Big Secret, a scandal if discovered. Yeah, sure, whatever. But now this lame accounting of the origins of the vine gives the Big Secret legs, at least in my mind. Is there a Big Secret? Why is it such a big deal? Are the worlds best Cab Sauv vines growing- unappreciated- in Pisa? I didn’t care before, but I do now! Cheers!


The homogenization of wine

September 20, 2010

So I’m reading the August issue of Decanter magazine (if you don’t subscribe, you probably should) specifically the article ‘Diamonds In The Rufina’. The author was talking about Chianti Classico vs Chiant Rufina, and how Rufina is staying stylistically closer to its roots. (If you don’t already know the differences between Classico and Rufina, please read our Chianti post here). You see, up to 30% ‘international varieties’ will soon be allowed, and lower levels are already allowed. The winemakers claim to use less than 10% other-than-Sangiovese grapes. While Classico tries to compete with all the other Big Reds out there by becoming Bigger and Redder, it is becoming frequently criticized for being overly ‘fleshy and weighty’ while Rufina maintains a more austere, structured, traditional style.
Now I know winemakers have to sell their wines. I acknowledge that they have to compete for Parker scores and magazine mention. I recently had a winemaker respond to one of my posts about this, saying she agreed with me in that terroir-driven, varietally correct, and stylistically true wines are the ideal, the winemaker always has to be mindful of what it takes to get noticed by critics, sommeliers, waiters and consumers. There’s the rub! It’s not the winemaker’s duty to make a particular wine regardless of the commercial aspects of what they’re doing, it’s our job as consumers to support a sophisticated market. If the only wines we drink are simple, fruity quaffing wines and Big Red Fruit Bombs, it’s not hard to understand why the market is flooded with them. You can’t fault a grower for not picking his ripe, balanced grapes at 23 brix if you only buy 15.5% alcohol wines. It’s perhaps the single greatest paradox in wine: grapes are terroir driven, wines are market driven. How those two meet in the middle is a tricky business. What is one to do? The answer, like so many uncomfortable answers, is simple- but not easy.
We need to mature as consumers. We need to know and appreciate how Merlot is different from Sangiovese, how Garnacha is different from Grenache, how Cava is different from Champagne. If we develop our appreciation for different varietals and styles, we will buy more diverse wines. Then, instead of just Big Reds, more regionally representative, terroir driven wines will thrive. We need to take the time, make the effort, and pay attention to wine. We will be rewarded a thousand-fold, and we’ll all be better for it. Cheers!


Who knew?

September 14, 2010

I mentioned in an earlier post that a good source of unoaked Chardonnay is Monterey.

Those I’ve tried have been I expensive, well-made examples of the leaner, more Burgundian style of Chard. In addition to being aware of good Chard coming out of Monterey, I had read that plantings were increasing, and the Monterey Valley was developing, along with other nearby regions from the Salinas Valley all the way down to Paso Robles. What I was totally unaware of, however, is that Monterey is not just growing and making more Chard; they’re making more Pinot Noir, too. According to Quarterly Review of Wines Monterey now makes more Pinot Noir than Sonoma! (QRW credits The Turrentine Outlook and the Grape Crush Report for reporting this). I had no idea! Of course, as soon as I read it I felt stupid for not putting it together sooner. Chardonnay and Pinot Noir are cold-climate cousins- a place that’s good for one is probably good for the other.

Chardonnay grapes

Where do you find great Pinot Noir? Carneros, Champagne, Burgundy. What is the other primary grape in each of those regions? Chardonnay! They both need a long, cool growing season to ripen without over-ripening and thus losing their acid and balance. Why do they both thrive in the same climate? Perhaps because they’re related: Pinot Noir is one of Chardonnay’s genetic parents! The other is the now-defunct Gouais Blanc. So I feel silly for not connecting the dots earlier between this cold-climate loving parent-child pair, but now that we know about it, what do we do? Find a Monterey Pinot, of course! I’ll be on the lookout for some and when I find them I’ll let you know where you can find them and how they stack up. I see a Napa-Sonoma-Monterey Pinot showdown in the near future! Cheers!


Note to self…

September 6, 2010

…when you find a great deal, buy all you want before you blab it all over. World Market’s all sold out!


Papa Luna on sale!

September 3, 2010

If you remember, we really like Papa Luna. Read our previous post on it here.

Well, it’s on sale: World Market has it on sale for only $10! I thought it was a steal at $14, so at this price I’m definitely going to stock up on it. I suggest you do, too. The only qualifier is that you have to join the Explorer Club, which is basically just giving them your email address. The wine should be available at all World Market locations (in Texas only), but the ad says ‘for a limited time’ without specifying an end date. So go grab a few bottles before it’s over, or they run out! Cheers!


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.